Manuscript checks
Set the bar yourself
Author-facing tools check whatever the author decides to check. Vendor tools check against the vendor’s standards. Your journal requirements get short shrift.
ChronosHub puts the decisions back in your hands: which checks run, at which point, and whether they advise an author or block a submission outright.
Improve quality before peer review
Authors get feedback while they can still act on it, helping resolve scope, language, and technical issues before submission.
Reduce downstream costs
Editorial teams, compliance specialists, and production staff spend less time correcting issues that could have been caught earlier.
Adapt as requirements change
New checks connect through the ChronosHub platform, so you change providers as you without touching your workflows.
Per journal configurations
Acceptable quality isn’t the same for every journal. A flagship title and a new open-access launch can reasonably draw the line in different places, even inside the same portfolio.
You set the threshold each journal applies. You also decide which checks are advisory or mandatory.
A world of checks
Scope Check
Grammar and Language Check
Technical Check
Editorial Check Results
Research Integrity Checks
Manuscript Check Configuration
Trusted by your peers
